The Long Journey to a Canadian Republic
TUESDAY, JULY 1, 2014 [UPDATED WEDNESDAY, JULY 1, 2015, THURSDAY, SEPTEMBER 15, 2016]: It’s not easy being a Canadian republican these days. Not someone who has anything to do with the Republican Party in the United States. But someone who believes that modern Canada is in practice, and ought to be in theory too, a parliamentary democratic republic — within all of the Arctic Council, APEC, ASEAN, the Commonwealth of Nations, the G8, the G20, La francophonie, NAFTA, NATO, OAS, OECD, and the United Nations, etc, etc, etc, etc … world without end.
A Canadian republican is also someone who believes that Canada today ought to have no official, legal, constitutional or other lingering colonial ties to the British monarchy, if you prefer to say it that way. At the same time, like India or Ireland or Trinidad & Tobago, the new Canadian republic of anyone’s realistic dreams will continue to be modeled on the established “Westminster” or British-style parliamentary institutions of government, which have served Canada well. Ever since the European “year of revolution” in 1848 coincided with colonial “responsible government” in British North America (following the Canadian rebellions of 1837–1838).
“The Long Journey to a Canadian Republic, 1963–20??” is the title of Part IV in Randall White’s current book project, tentatively entitled Children of the Global Village — Canada in the 21st Century : Tales about the history that matters. (One inspiration for the title and larger project has apparently been the late Bruce Trigger’s Ontario history classic of the mid 1970s — The Children of Aataentsic : A History of the Huron People to 1660. There have been several other such inspirations, including Peter B. Waite’s Canada 1874–1896 : Arduous Destiny ; An Australian Republic by Greg Barns and Anna Krawec-Wheaton ; Frederick Vaughan’s The Canadian Federalist Experiment : From Defiant Monarchy to Reluctant Republic ; and La solution : le programme du Parti québécois, présenté par René Lévesque.)
Mr. White has explained that Children of the Global Village is a work in progress, based on the following draft table of contents :
Prologue : too much geography
PART I : The Deep Canadian Past 1497–1763
PART II : Second British North America 1763–1867
PART III : Dominion of Canada 1867–1963
PART IV : The Long Journey to a Canadian Republic 1963–20??
Epilogue : the near future
Mr. White has further confessed that he is now into Part III on this outline. He hopes to be (considerably) further along by the 150th anniversary of the 1867 confederation on July 1, 2017. Meanwhile, he has consented to a counterweights program of early digital publishing for parts of the book that are now largely complete.
Following here, immediately below, is the current text for “Prologue : too much geography.” Subsequent draft chapters will be posted as initial blogs, with links below. We are at the moment hoping / thinking that the entire book might finally be pre-published in this way on this site — at least for a time :
Children of the Global Village
Canada in the 21st Century :
Tales about the history that matters
Prologue : too much geography
It was the middle of the summer of 1977. A new Parti Québécois provincial government was suddenly in power in Quebec, led by the chain-smoking René Lévesque. It believed in the “sovereignty”of Canada’s majority French-speaking province (also home to the first people who called themselves Canadians), whatever that may or may not mean, even today.
The local intelligentsia in the majority English-speaking rest of Canada were looking for guidance. To the west of Quebec, on a breezy early August Tuesday, the Anglo-American economist and philosopher Kenneth Boulding told a gathering of deep thinkers in the Ontario cottage country that Canada was an “absurd country straight out of Gilbert and Sullivan, whose very existence is an object lesson to the whole world … I’ve always thought, ‘If Canada could exist, what couldn’t?’”
Boulding was born in Liverpool, England, and educated at Oxford University. He became a citizen of the United States in 1948, and taught at the University of Michigan from 1949 to 1967, and then at the University of Colorado from 1967 until his retirement in 1980. But for a short period in 1946–1947 he was chairman of the economics department at McGill University in Montreal. So he had a slight first-hand acquaintance with one side of Canadian life.
In some respects Canada today is a much younger country than even many Canadians imagine. There was no such legal status as a “Canadian citizen” until after the Second World War. The first Canadian Citizenship Act took effect on January 1, 1947. From the later 18th century until 1947 Canadians had simply been “British subjects” resident in Canada.
So it is not too surprising that Kenneth Boulding, living among the still quasi-colonial high society of English-speaking Montreal, just after the Second World War, would interpret the Canada he saw up close as something “straight out of Gilbert and Sullivan.”
(Where William Schwenk Gilbert and Arthur Seymour Sullivan were British dramatists who collaborated on 14 comic operas between 1871 and 1896 — including H.M.S. Pinafore, The Pirates of Penzance, and The Mikado. And as a sign that Kenneth Boulding was not entirely wrong, there are still local branches of an international Gilbert and Sullivan society across Canada today, to “keep this wonderful British tradition alive for future generations.”)
* * * *
As true as all this is, the history of modern Canada also goes back much further than the first Canadian Citizenship Act of 1947. In some respects Canada is much older than we imagine. And modern Canadian history begins with a vast and rugged northern wilderness geography.
As explained by the man who still holds the record for longest-serving prime minister of the Canadian confederation of 1867, William Lyon Mackenzie King (1921–1926, 1926–1930, 1935–1948), modern Canada’s main geographic problem is that it has “too much geography.” It is nowadays, geographically, the second largest country in the world — surpassed only by the Russian Federation. And on this one measure the still somewhat tentative and aggressively polite if also increasingly crazy Canada of today is even slightly larger than the friendly giant next door. (Crazy, that is, as in Robyn Doolittle’s book, Crazy Town: The Rob Ford Story.)
In 1976 (the same year that René Lévesque’s Parti Québécois won a Quebec provincial election for the first time, on November 15) the Canadian historian Carl Berger published a book on The Writing of Canadian History.
Berger explained how “the belief that Canada developed not in spite of geography but because of it, and that there was a naturalness and solidity to the very structure of the country that lay far deeper than political arrangements,” was pioneered by Harold Adams Innis (1894–1952), who had become the first Canadian-born chairman of what was then known as the department of political economy at the University of Toronto in 1937. (Only mature academics from the United Kingdom were earlier thought suitable for this post.)
Born and raised on a “hick Baptist” farm in in the agrarian democratic heartland of Southwestern Ontario (to a family with earlier roots in New Brunswick), Innis began his academic teaching career in 1914 at a rural schoolhouse in Landonville, Alberta. He went on to become a wounded veteran of the First World War in Europe, and the husband of Mary Quayle from Wilmette, Illinois (close to where he completed a PhD in economics at the University of Chicago).
Innis joined the staff of the old department of political economy at the University of Toronto in 1920, and, despite other offers, remained there until his premature death from prostate cancer in 1952. In his very last years he was also the first Canadian president of the American Economic Association, and the godfather of Marshall McLuhan — who started mysteriously proclaiming that “the medium is the message” in the middle of the 1960s, about a dozen years after Innis’s premature death.
* * * *
The Times Literary Supplement in the United Kingdom once called Harold Innis “Canada’s first and perhaps only genuine intellectual.” And intellectually there were two Harold Innises.
The first was the author of The Fur Trade in Canada : An Introduction to Canadian Economic History (1930). Between the two world wars he helped crystallize the intellectual beginnings of a Canadian political future beyond the declining and falling British empire (which Lester Pearson and then Pierre Trudeau would start to bring to life in the world of practical politics, in the 1960s, 1970s, and early 1980s).
The second Harold Innis was the author of Empire and Communications (1950) — a study of communications media in world history, from papyrus in ancient Egypt to “Paper and the Printing Press” in modern Europe. This incarnation of Canada’s first and perhaps only genuine intellectual helped inspire the Alberta-born Marshall McLuhan’s invention of the “global village” in the 1960s. And from the vantage point of the early 21st century, the second Harold Innis was just as important for the Canadian future as the first one.
If Canada today were more like its first European mother country of France, it might know a little more about Harold Innis. Yet, as the late 19th century explained, Canada could have been blessed with French culture, British politics, and American business, but it wound up with American culture, French politics, and British business instead. (Things have changed since then, no doubt — but alas, some still complain, not all that much!)
For whatever reasons, Harold Innis is far from a household name in Canada today, in either official language, and/or among the aboriginal peoples of Canada, and the large numbers of Canadians who have come from all over the global village in the more recent past. He had and has his fair share of human flaws. His high academic stature in his own lifetime may have been an accident — and even, in the eyes of later generations it often seems, a mistake. There is an Innis College at the University of Toronto today, but its school song still asks “Who the hell is Harold Innis?”
Innis has nonetheless had some strange if still almost anonymous influence on Canadian public life since his death. In the words of the present-day journalist Rick Salutin, he was “perhaps Canada’s greatest iconoclast” (in a country not at least officially noted for such things). I hasten to add that you don’t have to know anything about Harold Innis to understand Canada today. But I became attracted to his writing (which I agree is not altogether easy to read), because it seemed to illuminate the vision of Canada I picked up much more casually from my father, who mostly read books about how to fix cars and build small boats.
To borrow one of Harold Innis’s own favourite geographic terms, an undoubted northern North American intellectual achievement of the later 20th century was the impressive first volume of the Historical Atlas of Canada, edited by R. Cole Harris of the University of British Columbia, and first published as long ago as 1987. There were insider complaints about how long it took for this carefully crafted collective enterprise (subtitled From the Beginning to 1800) to see the light of day. But when the volume finally appeared in print all was forgiven.
The resulting monument to the present’s quest for wisdom from the past, the general editor Cole Harris explained in his preface, “has tended to confirm Harold Innis’s general insights … As Innis maintained, the pattern of Canada has been taking shape for almost 500 years and by New World standards is old.”
Like Innis as well, the editors of the first volume of the Historical Atlas of Canada were concerned to acknowledge the still much longer evolution of the vast and rugged Canadian geography of today. The volume begins with “The Last Ice Sheets, 18 000–10 000 BC” (Plate 1). To start at the very beginning, that is to say, Canada is the most northerly part of North America that was entirely covered by ice 20,000 years ago.
* * * *
If this were a book about geography, a lot more could be said about the geographic framework of Canadian history. Most of what is most important in this respect will arise in other contexts, as this account of the growth of Canada’s modern democracy unfolds. But a few additional ingredients are worth some special mention at the start:
● The full western extent of the Canadian geography we know today was not clear until the late 18th century — when “Alex MacKenzie / from Canada / by land / 22d July 1793” appeared in vermilion and bear grease on a rock at the edge of the Pacific Ocean, near what is now Bella Coola, BC. The full northern extent remained murky until much more recently.
● “Canada” is almost certainly an aboriginal word, and aboriginal peoples played a key role in the expansion of the transcontinental Canadian fur trade that finally went “from coast to coast to coast.” But aboriginal Canada was of course not geographically united like modern Canada, whose ultimate advent in this respect is suggested by the last plate in the 1987 first volume of the Historical Atlas of Canada, “Native Canada, ca. 1820.”
● The transcontinental east-west fur trade in northern North America was the first modern Canadian resource economy. On Harold Innis’s view, its golden age was dominated by the North West Company (1779–1821) — “the first large-scale continental organization in North America,” and “the forerunner of confederation” in Canada, “built on the work of the French voyageur, the contributions of the Indian, especially the canoe, Indian corn, and pemmican, and the organizing ability of Anglo-American merchants.”
● On the last leg of the North West Company pathfinder and map-maker David Thompson’s seminal journey to the Pacific Ocean in 1811, his 2003 biographer D’Arcy Jennish tells us, he was accompanied by nine men — “the French Canadians Michel Bourdeaux, Pierre Pareil, Joseph Coté, Michel Boulard and François Gregoire; the two Iroquois, Charles and Ignace ; and two Salish-speaking Sanpoil interpreters.”
● While it has proved a treasure chest of primary resource products — from furs and fish to lumber, pulp and paper, aluminum, gold and silver, nickel, wheat, corn, hydroelectricity, oil and gas, and more — even now most of Canada’s vast geography remains unsuited to extensive human settlement. Canada today is slightly larger geographically than all of the United States. Its population is slightly smaller than that of the current most populous US state of California.
● Most of Canada’s present population is still clustered along its southern border with the USA. But there are a few heroic exceptions. Edmonton, Alberta, at more than 53 degrees north latitude, is “the most northerly city in North America with a metropolitan population of over one million.” Alert, which hosts a radar and weather station in the Canadian Territory of Nunavut, at more than 83 degrees north latitude, is “the most northerly inhabited place in the world.”
● Prime Minister William Lyon Mackenzie King, the poet, lawyer, and canoeist Frank Scott told us back in the 1950s, “never let his on the one hand / Know what his on the other hand was doing.” On the one hand, the transcontinental geography of the first Canadian resource economy, especially rooted in a vast network of interior waterways, showed that “there was a naturalness and solidity to the very structure of the country that lay far deeper than political arrangements.” On the other hand, too much diverse geography in Canada has also aided and abetted too much regionalism. In a 1940s essay on “Decentralization and Democracy,” Harold Innis wrote: “The complex problems of regionalization in the recent development of Canada render the political structure obsolete …” And this remains an issue in the early 21st century! Politically, it at least ought to lead into the longstanding debate on Canadian Senate reform.
● In what the Constitution Act, 1982 with its Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms alludes to as “a free and democratic society,” we all make up our own minds on such questions as the deepest meaning of Canada today. Yet however you decide, to start at the very beginning, again, what George Grant, the 1960s author of Lament for a Nation: The Defeat of Canadian Nationalism, might call the deepest and most chthonic truth remains: Canada is the most northerly part of North America that was entirely covered by ice 20,000 years ago.
People in more southerly regions may find this amusing — and it no doubt is in some ways. (And no doubt as well, from the standpoint of Southern California, Canada is just too cold, for a good part of the year at least.) Yet as Pierre Trudeau urged in the late 1960s: “In the past the teaching of history in our schools has been dominated by traditions inherited from Europe. On that continent history has been filled with battles and the lives of national heroes. In Canada we have had few decisive battles and not many dominant leaders. Much more important to our history has been the struggle of nameless Canadians to improve their lives in our often hostile environment. This struggle has produced its share of adventure and heroism.”
* * * *
Meanwhile, it is at least one of this book’s hypotheses that the journey Lester Pearson and Pierre Trudeau began in the 1960s — and that Pierre Trudeau and the provincial premiers, less René Lévesque, finally consummated with the Canadian Constitution Act, 1982 — was in some degree prefaced, or even made possible, by a journey that Harold Innis and his friend John Long completed in the late spring and summer of 1924.
Innis’s and Long’s adventure began with a routine train trip from Toronto to Winnipeg late in May. (Though even this can be an almost serious northern journey, if you look out the windows, even today.) Then, through a more exotic assortment of railway excursions, they had finally arrived in the northwestern Alberta town of Peace River on Tuesday, June 10. Here they would change their mode of transportation, and travel all the way to the Northwest Territories outpost at Aklavik, the now decommissioned head of the Mackenzie River delta, gateway to the Beaufort Sea and the Arctic Ocean.
This was the furthest retreat, so to speak, of the ancient northern North American resource economy of the fur trade in the early 20th century. The 1924 trip with his friend John Long was Harold Innis’s field work for his book on The Fur Trade in Canada that would be published in 1930. He wanted to do more than research his subject in dusty documents in libraries. He wanted to see things first hand.
When they arrived at the jump-off point for the most daring part of their journey on June 10, Innis wrote a letter to his wife, Mary Quayle : “We have our tent put up and at present I am looking out over the Peace River … Our canoe has not arrived. It was promised today but the freight doesn’t get in until tomorrow. We shall probably get away Thursday morning. Then we have three hundred miles to the next Post Office at Fort Vermilion and I shall drop you a line from there.”
The canoe in question was an 18-foot canvas-covered craft from the Hudson’s Bay Company. Emulating much earlier fur-trade voyageurs, Innis and Long paddled it down the Peace River to the Slave River, and then along the Slave River to Great Slave Lake. On July 6 they camped at Fort Resolution, and Innis wrote again to his wife : “I am looking out over Great Slave Lake through a maze of tents and teepees. The Indians are all over the place — they are coming in for ‘Treaty money’. And of course they all have dogs so that you can imagine what the place is like. We are hoping to go to Hay River as soon as a motor boat comes along.”
Two days later the Hudson’s Bay Company tug Liard River took Innis and Long west on Great Slave Lake to the Mackenzie River, and then down the Mackenzie to Aklavik and the Arctic Ocean. This motor boat, Innis had earlier been informed, was “not a passenger vessel in the ordinary sense” and gave accommodation to the two still rather young men from the south “only … as an exceptional favour.” But this “rough and simple but friendly transport” on the Mackenzie River was at least a lot easier than paddling an 18-foot canvas-covered canoe down the Peace and Slave rivers. Innis and Long spent a lot of time “lying on the sunlit deck of the Liard River,” watching the far Canadian north go by.
* * * *
* For Chapter 1 of PART I : THE DEEP CANADIAN PAST, 1497–1763 see “Misty contact : Giovanni Caboto and sponsor in Atlantic Canada , 1485–1689” or CLICK HERE .
* For Chapter 2 of PART I : THE DEEP CANADIAN PAST, 1497–1763 see “How the aboriginal peoples of Canada have given more than a name to Canadian history” or CLICK HERE.
* For Chapter 3 of PART I : THE DEEP CANADIAN PAST, 1497–1763 see “France in America and the first people who called themselves Canadians” or CLICK HERE.
* For Chapter 4 of PART I : THE DEEP CANADIAN PAST, 1497–1763 see “First Quest for the Northwest in Canada, 1615–1760” or CLICK HERE.
* For Chapter 6 of PART I : THE DEEP CANADIAN PAST, 1497–1763 see “Three 18th century wars that made two countries, 1754–1784” or CLICK HERE.
* * * *
* For Chapter 1 of PART II : SECOND BRITISH NORTH AMERICA, 1763–1867 see “The new northern British America in the late 18th and early 19th centuries” or CLICK HERE.
* For Chapter 2 of PART II : SECOND BRITISH NORTH AMERICA, 1763–1867 see “The beginnings of various regional democracies in what is now Canada, after the War of 1812” or CLICK HERE.
* For Chapter 3 of PART II : SECOND BRITISH NORTH AMERICA, 1763–1867 see “The Canadian boom of the 1850s and the road to Confederation, 1848–1864” or CLICK HERE.
* For Chapter 4 of PART II : SECOND BRITISH NORTH AMERICA, 1763–1867 see “The American Civil War and the British North America Act, 1867” or CLICK HERE.
* * * *
* For Chapter 1 of PART III : THE DOMINION OF CANADA, 1867–1963 see “First self-governing dominion of the British empire : Further founding moments, 1867–1873” or CLICK HERE.
MORE TO COME …